Coming soon

Something new is taking shape

We're putting the finishing touches on Flov. Leave your email and be the first to try the model.

Free early access before the official launch
Applications · 43 cases

Use cases

Built for real work. The decisions your team makes by hand every day — classify, prioritize, route, verify — written down as criteria and applied at scale.

Talk to sales

Can't find your use case or want to know more? Talk to us and we'll define it together.

AI infrastructure

The layer that decides inside your own AI stack.

AI infrastructure

What context goes in, which model answers, what gets blocked. You define the criteria in plain text and get a typed, traceable decision at every step.

Examples
  • Scores query–candidate relevance
  • Reranks results with pairwise comparisons
  • Selects the useful context for the next step
Examples
  • Detects jailbreaks and prompt injection
  • Flags policy violations and sensitive data
  • Logs results and probabilities to trace failures
Examples
  • Decides whether each line break splits a sentence
  • Regroups into blocks and classifies them afterwards
  • No templates or per-format rules
Examples
  • Classifies intent and domain
  • Estimates difficulty and risk
  • Escalates to the expensive model only when needed
Examples
  • Scores hundreds of candidates in a single call
  • Re-evaluates the best ones against their full documentation
  • Avoids loading the whole catalog into context
Examples
  • Scores faithfulness, tone and coverage
  • Compares prompt versions on the same set
  • Catches regressions before deploying

If it can be written, it can be classified.

Automate
AI infrastructure

Your case isn't on the list? Describe the criteria in plain text and get a typed, traceable decision on your own data.

Try it yourself Talk to sales No prior integration · results in minutes
Benchmarks · Oct 2026

How Flov compares

Accuracy across key areas against reference models. Hover each axis to see the detail.

Flov-One-1.0 Pro

Maximum accuracy
Reasoning 7 benchmarks

Flov Pro vs. Model A

General knowledge and reasoning

Pro · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model A · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
5-shot evaluation on the full sets · September 2026
Math 6 benchmarks

Flov Pro vs. Model B

Step-by-step problem solving

Pro · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model B · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
No external tools · pass@1 with greedy decoding
Code 6 benchmarks

Flov Pro vs. Model C

Code generation and repair

Pro · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model C · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
SWE-bench Verified with the same agent for both models · October 2026

Flov-One-1.0 Flash

Low latency
Structured output 6 benchmarks

Flov Flash vs. Model D

JSON, extraction and tool use

Flash · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model D · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
JSON Schema measures schema-valid responses on the first attempt
Multilingual 6 benchmarks

Flov Flash vs. Model E

Understanding and generation across languages

Flash · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model E · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
Average over 14 languages · 0-shot evaluation
Long context 6 benchmarks

Flov Flash vs. Model F

Retrieval and reasoning over long documents

Flash · average
0.0%
Full sets
Model F · average
0.0%
Same protocol
Biggest gap
+0.0pts
128K-token window · same instructions for both models
Latency · Oct 2026

Answers in milliseconds

Time to the full response, measured from the request, in the same region and with the same prompt for every model.

Low latency

Flov-One-1.0 Flash

0ms
Full response · p50
Enterprise
<0ms
Dedicated capacity
Maximum accuracy

Flov-One-1.0 Pro

0ms
Full response · p50
Enterprise
<0ms
Dedicated capacity

Median of 10,000 requests per model with a 1,000-token prompt · October 2026